Unattributed spend
A growing share of the AI bill maps to no team, no application, and no cost center. It cannot be forecast, cannot be allocated, and cannot be governed.
AI Cost Intelligence
The AI Token Optimization Assessment maps every AI API dollar across Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Vertex AI, and direct APIs to the team, application, and environment that generated it. No tagging prerequisite. No self-reported spreadsheets. Evidence from your live environment, delivered in days.
The Problem
Teams adopt LLM APIs the way they once adopted cloud: fast, without a provisioning process, and without a budget model. By the time finance notices, the bill has tripled and nobody can say which team, application, or experiment is driving it.
A growing share of the AI bill maps to no team, no application, and no cost center. It cannot be forecast, cannot be allocated, and cannot be governed.
Workloads launched outside any formal process are often the fastest-growing spend category, and the next runaway workload is usually hiding among them.
Token spend does not grow like infrastructure spend. One team scaling an agent from 2 users to 34 can multiply a line item by ten in a quarter.
Provider quotas sit at the account level, not per workload. A runaway or compromised workload can consume the whole quota and generate unbounded spend.
Without per-team and per-application thresholds, the first alert most organizations get is the monthly invoice.
When 38 percent of spend has no owner, every projection handed to the board is a guess. The CFO knows it, and so does the audit committee.
The Attribution Gap
These are the questions this assessment answers with evidence from your live environment, not estimates.
What the Assessment Finds
Sample findings below are drawn from an illustrative assessment of a fictional industrial enterprise, Astro Mining International, with six AWS accounts and two Azure subscriptions. The structure is exactly what you receive for your environment.
Sample finding. Illustrative environment.
The unattributed category was the fastest-growing spend line in the environment, up 1,616 percent in six months, reflecting AI experiments launched outside any formal process. At the observed growth rate, monthly spend would cross $198,000 by Q4 with no intervention. One provider project carried $8,200 per month in spend whose owner had left the organization 60 days earlier with no documented handoff. None of the critical remediations required architectural change: they were budget, quota, tagging, and IAM scope corrections.
How It Works
The assessment runs as two scoped, deterministic, approval-gated phases: inventory discovery through approved connectors, then deterministic policy checks against that inventory. Oscar never performs open-ended network scanning, and no action executes without explicit human sign-off.
Oscar connects through approved connectors using read-only access and the permissions your engineers already hold. Setup takes under 30 minutes. No credentials are stored centrally and no changes are made to your environment.
Cost APIs, provider-native token metering, IAM policy analysis, and runtime logs are correlated in the Cloud Intelligence Graph. Every dollar is resolved to a team, application, and environment where the evidence supports it, and flagged as unattributed where it does not.
Budget coverage, quota placement, alerting thresholds, and attribution completeness are checked deterministically against the discovered inventory. Same inputs, same findings, every time. Findings are labeled Live, Inferred, or Gap so you can see the evidence basis for each one.
Spend trend and forecast, full attribution map, provider and account breakdown, and a prioritized roadmap where every item is an Oscar-ready task with an owner and a time horizon attached.
What You Get
Every number in the report is traceable to a live API response, a policy analysis, or an explicitly labeled inference. Nothing is assembled from interviews.
Month-by-month spend across all providers with growth attribution by application, plus a forward forecast showing where the number lands with and without controls.
Every dollar mapped to team, owner, application, and environment. The unattributed share is called out exactly, not approximated, so you know precisely what cannot currently be governed.
Spend by provider, model, account, and environment across Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, Vertex AI, and direct APIs. Concentration risks and orphaned projects surfaced explicitly.
Recommended budgets, quotas, and alert thresholds by team and application, sized from observed usage rather than guesswork, with the highest-leverage controls first.
Every finding delivered as an Oscar-ready task with owner, priority, and time horizon. Items marked NOW require no architectural change and are addressable within 30 days.
The assessment is a baseline. Monitoring keeps it current: new workload detected, alert fires. Spend crosses a threshold, alert fires. Growth trend shifts, you know first.
Why OpsCanvas
Provider cost dashboards tell you what you spent by service. They cannot tell you which team owns the spend, which application generated it, or what happens to the number next quarter, because that requires correlating cost data with IAM identities, runtime logs, and organizational topology.
The usual fix is a tagging initiative that takes two quarters and decays the moment it ships. OpsCanvas skips the prerequisite: the Cloud Intelligence Graph resolves ownership from what is actually running, so attribution arrives in days and does not depend on tag discipline.
Common Questions
No. Attribution is resolved from the Cloud Intelligence Graph, which correlates IAM roles, resource relationships, execution logs, and organizational topology. Where tagging exists it is used as one signal among several. Where it does not, ownership is resolved from what is actually running.
AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, and GCP Vertex AI through their native cost and metering APIs, plus direct API usage such as OpenAI and Anthropic where it is observable from your environment through runtime logs and egress patterns.
No. Oscar performs no open-ended or autonomous network scanning. The assessment runs as two scoped, deterministic, approval-gated phases: inventory discovery through approved connectors using existing permissions, then deterministic policy checks against that inventory.
The unattributed share is the exact portion of spend where the graph found no consistent identity or ownership linkage sufficient to assign an owner with confidence. It is not an estimate, and the report shows the evidence basis for every attributed dollar as well.
Every finding arrives as an Oscar-ready task with owner and priority attached. You can execute the roadmap yourself, or run Oscar in co-pilot mode where Oscar proposes each action, an engineer approves it, and every change is logged with a full audit trail. Ongoing monitoring is available to keep the baseline current.
Yes, and it usually should be. The Context Graph is built once, so the Agent Risk Assessment and GPU Optimization Assessment stack on the same foundation at reduced incremental effort. Token spend and agent risk in particular are two views of the same inventory.
Get Started
Read-only connection through approved connectors. No tagging required. No changes to your environment. An evidence-backed spend picture in days.
Read-only access | No changes to your environment | Setup under 30 minutes